Successful Judgement in Labour Appeal Court
Proud and privileged to have been involved in this successful Judgement in the Labour Appeal Court for our client, Legal Aid South Africa.
Legal Aid South Africa v Jansen (CA3/2019) [2020] ZALAC 37 (21 July 2020)
Proud and privileged to have been involved in this successful Judgement in the Labour Appeal Court for our client, Legal Aid South Africa whom had appealed against the judgment of the Labour Court which had held that Mr Jansen’s dismissal was automatically unfair in terms of section 187(1)(f) of the Labour Relations Act and that he had been unfairly discriminated against in terms of section 6 of the Employment Equity Act . The Labour Appeal Court held that depression is a prevalent illness, employers have a duty to deal with it sympathetically and should investigate it fully and consider reasonable accommodation and alternatives short of dismissal. In addition, where depression may account in part for an employee’s misconduct, depending on the circumstances and the nature of the misconduct, dismissal may not be appropriate. However, for the reasons explained in the full Judgement copied herein, there was no proper claim of substantive unfairness and the Labour Court had erred in finding unfair discrimination and that the dismissal was automatically unfair. The appeal was therefore upheld.
*Disclaimer: This advisory should not be interpreted as legal advice.
Author: Michele Engela
Related News
Constructive Dismissal in South Africa: When a Resignation Is Really a Dismissal
Excerpt
When does a resignation count as a dismissal? We examine the legal test for constructive dismissal, key court decisions and practical steps for employees and employers.
Safety Requirements for Retailers
Retailers have a legal duty to take reasonable steps to keep lawful shoppers safe. We consider liability for slip-and-fall injuries and the limits of disclaimer notices.
When Can a CCMA Commissioner Correct an Earlier Jurisdictional Ruling?
When can a CCMA commissioner correct a jurisdictional ruling? Ntombela clarifies when functus officio does not apply.



